Ramon Diaz-Cortez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

444 F. App'x 983
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 25, 2011
Docket08-71549
StatusUnpublished

This text of 444 F. App'x 983 (Ramon Diaz-Cortez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramon Diaz-Cortez v. Eric H. Holder Jr., 444 F. App'x 983 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ramon Diaz-Cortez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision pretermitting his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.

Because Diaz-Cortez failed to demonstrate a gross miscarriage of justice at his prior proceedings, he may not collaterally attack his 2004 removal order. See Ramirez-Juarez v. INS, 633 F.2d 174,175-76 (9th Cir.1980) (per curiam) (“This court has consistently held that an alien cannot collaterally attack an earlier exclusion or deportation at a subsequent deportation hearing, in the absence of a gross miscarriage of justice at the prior proceedings.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 F. App'x 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramon-diaz-cortez-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca9-2011.