Ramon Cortez Castro v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Ramon Cortez Castro v. United States

436 F.2d 975

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 8, 1971

Docket25197_1

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 436 F.2d 975 (Ramon Cortez Castro v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramon Cortez Castro v. United States, 436 F.2d 975 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

On the authority of United States v. Weber, 429 F.2d 148 (9th Cir. 1970) and Quijada Gaxiola v. United States, 435 F.2d 264, (9th Cir., 1970), the order of dismissal is affirmed. 1

1

. While Judge Ely concurs in the result, he wishes it noted that he does not retreat from the views expressed in his separate concurring opinion in Quijada Qamiola.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

On the authority of United States v. Weber, 429 F.2d 148 (9th Cir. 1970) and Quijada Gaxiola v. United States, 435 F.2d 264, (9th Cir., 1970), the order of dismissal is affirmed. 1

1

. While Judge Ely concurs in the result, he wishes it noted that he does not retreat from the views expressed in his separate concurring opinion in Quijada Qamiola.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

436 F.2d 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramon-cortez-castro-v-united-states-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack