Ramnarine v. Ashcroft
This text of 107 F. App'x 165 (Ramnarine v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
MEMORANDUM
Substantial evidence does not support the conclusion that the government was able to control the alleged persecutors. See Wang v. Ashcroft, 341 F.3d 1015, 1019-20 (9th Cir.2003); Singh v. INS, 134 F.3d 962, 967 n. 9 (9th Cir.1998). Therefore, we grant the petition and remand to the Board of Immigration Appeals for a determination of whether the treatment suffered by the petitioner rises to the level of persecution. Cf. Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir.1995).
PETITION GRANTED AND REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 F. App'x 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramnarine-v-ashcroft-ca9-2004.