Ramlall v. Colonial Steel Corp.

307 A.D.2d 260, 761 N.Y.S.2d 870
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 7, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant, Colonial Steel Corp., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D. Schmidt, J.), dated December 13, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the contention of the defendant, Colonial Steel Corp., the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendant failed to tender sufficient evidence demonstrating the absence of any material issues of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramlall v. Colonial Steel Corp., 307 A.D.2d 260, 761 N.Y.S.2d 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

307 A.D.2d 260 (Ramlall v. Colonial Steel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vestal v. County of Suffolk
7 A.D.3d 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)