Ramlack v. Wolf

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Ramlack v. Wolf

35 A. 879, 178 Pa. 356, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1177

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 9, 1896

DocketAppeal, No. 37

StatusPublished

This text of 35 A. 879 (Ramlack v. Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramlack v. Wolf, 35 A. 879, 178 Pa. 356, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1177 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

A careful consideration of this record has failed to convince us that there was any substantial error in the trial. On the contrary, the instructions complained of in the assignments of error appear to be correct. The case depended on questions of fact which were properly submitted to the jury and by them found in favor of the plaintiff.

For reasons given in the court’s opinion on the motion for a new trial, we think the judgment should not be disturbed.

.Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam,

A careful consideration of this record has failed to convince us that there was any substantial error in the trial. On the contrary, the instructions complained of in the assignments of error appear to be correct. The case depended on questions of fact which were properly submitted to the jury and by them found in favor of the plaintiff.

For reasons given in the court’s opinion on the motion for a new trial, we think the judgment should not be disturbed.

.Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 A. 879, 178 Pa. 356, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramlack-v-wolf-pa-1896.