Ramiro Tula Rubio v. Loretta Lynch

805 F.3d 185, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18794, 2015 WL 6657575
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 28, 2015·No. 14-60183·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER:

A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the reconsideration of this cause en banc, and a majority of ‘the judges in active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. [186]*186R. App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), rehearing en bane is DENIED.

In the en banc poll, 5 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, and Elrod), and 10 judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly, Davis, Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Haynes, Graves,. Hig-ginson, and Costa).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramiro Tula Rubio v. Loretta Lynch, 805 F.3d 185, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 18794, 2015 WL 6657575 (5th Cir. 2015).

805 F.3d 185 (Ramiro Tula Rubio v. Loretta Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CASTILLO ANGULO
27 I. & N. Dec. 194 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 2018)