Ramiro R. Armendariz v. State Farm Lloyds and Daniel Longoria
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00787-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
RAMIRO R. ARMENDARIZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE FARM LLOYDS AND DANIEL LONGORIA, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Ramiro R. Armendariz, filed an appeal from a judgment rendered
against him in favor of appellees, State Farm Lloyds and Daniel Longoria. On February
11, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above
cause was originally due on February 4, 2013, and that the deputy district clerk, Jesus Cantu, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of
the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps
could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3,
42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days
from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 14th day of March, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramiro R. Armendariz v. State Farm Lloyds and Daniel Longoria (Ramiro R. Armendariz v. State Farm Lloyds and Daniel Longoria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.