Ramiro R. Armendariz v. State Farm Lloyds and Daniel Longoria

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 14, 2013
• Docket: 13-12-00787-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00787-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

RAMIRO R. ARMENDARIZ, Appellant,

v.

STATE FARM LLOYDS AND DANIEL LONGORIA, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Ramiro R. Armendariz, filed an appeal from a judgment rendered

against him in favor of appellees, State Farm Lloyds and Daniel Longoria. On February

11, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above

cause was originally due on February 4, 2013, and that the deputy district clerk, Jesus Cantu, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of

the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps

could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3,

42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days

from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution.

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 14th day of March, 2013.