Ramiro Ibarra v. Rick Thaler, Director

723 F.3d 599
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 18, 2013·No. 11-70031·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Treating the Appellant’s motion for en banc rehearing as a motion for panel rehearing, and given the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trevino v. Thaler, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 1911, 185 L.Ed.2d 1044 (2013), the court GRANTS the motion for rehearing in part.1 We hereby VACATE our prior panel decision only to the extent inconsistent with Trevino and grant a COA only to that extent; in all other respects, the majority and dissenting opinions remain in effect. In light of this new authority, we VACATE the district court’s order to the extent inconsistent with Trevino and REMAND to the district court for proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramiro Ibarra v. Rick Thaler, Director, 723 F.3d 599 (5th Cir. 2013).

723 F.3d 599 (Ramiro Ibarra v. Rick Thaler, Director) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. Lumpkin
Fifth Circuit, 2023
Walter Sorto v. Lorie Davis, Director
859 F.3d 356 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
Gonzalez, Isaac
Texas Supreme Court, 2015
Steven Butler v. William Stephens, Director
625 F. App'x 641 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)
Lewis, Aundri D AKA Aundri Lewis
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015