Ramiro Espinoza and Jeanette Espinoza v. Jesse Flores
This text of Ramiro Espinoza and Jeanette Espinoza v. Jesse Flores (Ramiro Espinoza and Jeanette Espinoza v. Jesse Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00223-CV
Ramiro ESPINOZA and Jeanette Espinoza, Appellants
v.
Jesse FLORES, Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CV05800 Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 19, 2023
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed by June 12, 2023. Neither the brief nor a
motion for extension of time was filed. By order dated June 22, 2023, appellant was ordered to
file her brief and to show cause in writing by July 3, 2023, why this appeal should not be dismissed
for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellant did not respond to this court’s order,
and, to date, appellant has not filed a brief. Because appellant failed to timely file a brief in this
appeal, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ramiro Espinoza and Jeanette Espinoza v. Jesse Flores, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramiro-espinoza-and-jeanette-espinoza-v-jesse-flores-texapp-2023.