Ramiro Delgado v. State
This text of Ramiro Delgado v. State (Ramiro Delgado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 13, 2002
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
The trial court imposed sentence pursuant to a plea-bargained conviction on August 19, 2002, and appellant did not file a motion for new trial. The deadline for filing a notice of appeal was therefore September 18, 2002. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due fifteen days later on October 3, 2002. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Appellant's notice of appeal and motion for leave to file a late notice of appeal were postmarked October 7, 2002 and received for filing on October 8.
Because the notice of appeal and motion for extension of time to file the notice were not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals from felony convictions). Accordingly, we dismiss the motion for leave and the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ramiro Delgado v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramiro-delgado-v-state-texapp-2002.