Ramirez v. State

166 Tex. Crim. 17
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ramirez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 Tex. Crim. 109
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 5, 1958·No. No. 29,616·Published

Opinion

BELCHER, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, 40 days in jail and a fine of $30.

The testimony of the state shows that the appellant, an adult male, cut the injured party, a female, on the face but that the instrument used was unknown. The injured party testified that immediately after being cut she went to a hospital where “they sewed me up.”

Appellant, while testifying in his own behalf, admitted that the injured party was cut with his knife, but stated that it was an accident.

The court charged the jury that if the injury was the result of an accident to find the appellant not guilty.

The jury resolved the issue of accident against the appellant and we find the evidence sufficient to support its verdict.

There are no formal bills of exception and the informal bills appearing in the record do not show error.

[18]*18The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramirez v. State, 166 Tex. Crim. 17 (Tex. 1958).

166 Tex. Crim. 17 (Ramirez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.