Ramirez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ramirez v. State

20 Tex. Ct. App. 133, 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 20

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 9, 1886·No. No. 1830·Published

Opinion

White, Presiding Judge.

So far as the fraudulent taking of the animal is concerned, the evidence is wholly circumstantial. Ho charge or instruction was given the jury by the court upon the law applicable to such a state of facts. It is therefore, as has been repeatedly decided, fundamentally deficient. (See authorities collated in Wright v. The State, 18 Texas Ct. App., 358.)

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

White, Presiding Judge.

So far as the fraudulent taking of the animal is concerned, the evidence is wholly circumstantial. Ho charge or instruction was given the jury by the court upon the law applicable to such a state of facts. It is therefore, as has been repeatedly decided, fundamentally deficient. (See authorities collated in Wright v. The State, 18 Texas Ct. App., 358.)

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Ramirez v. State, 20 Tex. Ct. App. 133, 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 20 (Tex. Ct. App. 1886).

Pincite

20 Tex. Ct. App. 133 (Ramirez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.