Ramirez v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ramirez v. Smith

128 A.D.2d 511, 512 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44203

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 2, 1987·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract for failure to provide heat to a certain leased commercial premises, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered October 23, 1985, which, inter alia, dismissed the complaint and ordered that the plaintiff be evicted from the premises.

Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance, and the appellant is directed to file with this court a proper appendix complying with the rules of this court within 60 days from the date of this decision and order. In the event the appellant fails to file a proper appendix with this court within 60 days from the date of this decision and order, the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s appendix is patently insufficient to make a determination of the issues which she raises (see, CPLR 5528; 22 NYCRR 670.17). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract for failure to provide heat to a certain leased commercial premises, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered October 23, 1985, which, inter alia, dismissed the complaint and ordered that the plaintiff be evicted from the premises.

Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance, and the appellant is directed to file with this court a proper appendix complying with the rules of this court within 60 days from the date of this decision and order. In the event the appellant fails to file a proper appendix with this court within 60 days from the date of this decision and order, the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s appendix is patently insufficient to make a determination of the issues which she raises (see, CPLR 5528; 22 NYCRR 670.17). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Ramirez v. Smith, 128 A.D.2d 511, 512 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

128 A.D.2d 511 (Ramirez v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related