Ramirez v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ramirez v. Smith

128 A.D.2d 511, 512 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 128 A.D.2d 511 (Ramirez v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramirez v. Smith, 128 A.D.2d 511, 512 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract for failure to provide heat to a certain leased commercial premises, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered October 23, 1985, which, inter alia, dismissed the complaint and ordered that the plaintiff be evicted from the premises.

Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance, and the appellant is directed to file with this court a proper appendix complying with the rules of this court within 60 days from the date of this decision and order. In the event the appellant fails to file a proper appendix with this court within 60 days from the date of this decision and order, the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s appendix is patently insufficient to make a determination of the issues which she raises (see, CPLR 5528; 22 NYCRR 670.17). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract for failure to provide heat to a certain leased commercial premises, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered October 23, 1985, which, inter alia, dismissed the complaint and ordered that the plaintiff be evicted from the premises.

Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance, and the appellant is directed to file with this court a proper appendix complying with the rules of this court within 60 days from the date of this decision and order. In the event the appellant fails to file a proper appendix with this court within 60 days from the date of this decision and order, the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s appendix is patently insufficient to make a determination of the issues which she raises (see, CPLR 5528; 22 NYCRR 670.17). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 A.D.2d 511, 512 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-v-smith-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack