Ramirez v. Santarpia

268 A.D.2d 257, 701 N.Y.S.2d 367, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 333
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 11, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 257 (Ramirez v. Santarpia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramirez v. Santarpia, 268 A.D.2d 257, 701 N.Y.S.2d 367, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered October 19, 1998, which granted defendants’ motion to change venue from Bronx County to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly granted in view of defendants’ submission of a deed and utility bills showing that the defendant who plaintiff claims resides in the Bronx actually resides in Westchester. These documents corroborate that individual’s detailed affidavit explaining, among other things, that the Bronx address listed in his driver’s license was for unknown reasons left unchanged by the Department of Motor Vehicles despite his having submitted a change of address when he renewed his license more than a year before the accident (compare, Martinez v Semicevic, 178 AD2d 228). Concur—Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Wallach, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vaccaro v. Mercedes-Benz USA
200 N.Y.S.3d 10 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 257, 701 N.Y.S.2d 367, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-v-santarpia-nyappdiv-2000.