Ramirez v. New York State Division of Human Rights
This text of 828 N.E.2d 80 (Ramirez v. New York State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with [790]*790costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court dismissing the petition reinstated.
Documents that were part of the administrative record, and are part of the appeal before us, specifically detail conferences between the Division and petitioner, and demonstrate that a meaningful investigation of petitioner’s complaint occurred. Based on that investigation, the Division’s finding of no probable cause was not arbitrary, capricious or lacking a rational basis (see Washington Sq. Inst, for Psychotherapy & Mental Health v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 67 NY2d 699, 701 [1986]).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur in memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
828 N.E.2d 80, 4 N.Y.3d 789, 795 N.Y.S.2d 164, 2005 N.Y. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-v-new-york-state-division-of-human-rights-ny-2005.