Ramirez v. Nevada Police Department

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA DENISE RAMIREZ, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01116-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order (1) Accepting Report and Recommendation and (2) Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 6] NEVADA POLICE DEPARTMENT, 7 Defendant 8 On September 16, 2024, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case 9] without prejudice because plaintiff Denise Ramirez did not file an amended complaint by the given deadline. ECF No. 6. Ramirez did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) 141 (en banc) (‘the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 6) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 4th day of October, 2024. 20 OLA a ANDREWP.GORDON. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE