Ramirez v. Mukasey
This text of 309 F. App'x 194 (Ramirez v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Carmen Facundo Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancel[195]*195lation of removal based on his failure to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen child.
We lack jurisdiction to review petitioner’s contention that he established the requisite extreme hardship to his qualifying relative because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
309 F. App'x 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-v-mukasey-ca9-2009.