Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL

763 N.W.2d 639, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 76, 2009 WL 1012234
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 31, 2009·No. A08-2151·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 17, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ G. Barry Anderson

Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL, 763 N.W.2d 639, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 76, 2009 WL 1012234 (Mich. 2009).

763 N.W.2d 639 (Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)