Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL

763 N.W.2d 639, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 76, 2009 WL 1012234

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 31, 2009

DocketA08-2151

StatusPublished

This text of 763 N.W.2d 639 (Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramirez v. MARATHON ASHLAND OIL, 763 N.W.2d 639, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 76, 2009 WL 1012234 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 17, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ G. Barry Anderson

Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI