Ramirez v. Jorda Enterprises Inc.

164 So. 3d 1291, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9313, 2015 WL 3822928
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 2015
DocketNo. 1D14-4708
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 164 So. 3d 1291 (Ramirez v. Jorda Enterprises Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramirez v. Jorda Enterprises Inc., 164 So. 3d 1291, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9313, 2015 WL 3822928 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

[1292]*1292 OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/WRITTEN OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing/Written Opinion. We grant the motion, withdraw our former opinion of May 4, 2015, and substitute this opinion in its place.

Based on this Court’s decision in Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg/City of St Petersburg Risk Management, 122 So.3d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (en banc), the Judge of Compensation Claims correctly limited the award of temporary benefits to 104 weeks. On appeal in this court, Appellant failed to establish that Section 440.15(4)(e), Florida Statutes (2011), is unconstitutional as applied to him.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., RAY and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gomez-Lujano v. Palm Beach Grill-Houston's Restaurant & Travelers Insurance
178 So. 3d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 So. 3d 1291, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9313, 2015 WL 3822928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-v-jorda-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-2015.