Ramirez v. Dennison

39 A.D.3d 310, 834 N.Y.S.2d 120
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 12, 2007·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered on or about July 7, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, denied respondent’s motion to change venue to either Orange or Albany County, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted insofar as to transfer the proceeding to Albany County.

In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, petitioner challenges the denial of his parole application. Accordingly, pursuant to CPLR 506 (b), venue should have been placed in the judicial district where the complained-of parole determination was rendered, or where respondent’s principal office is located (see Matter of Howard v New York State Bd. of Parole, 5 AD3d 271 [2004]). Inasmuch as the challenged determination was affirmed on administrative appeal in Albany County, where respondent has his principal office, Albany County, and not the Bronx, is a proper venue for the proceeding, and we grant respondent’s motion to the extent of transferring the proceeding to Albany County. Concur—Tom, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramirez v. Dennison, 39 A.D.3d 310, 834 N.Y.S.2d 120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

39 A.D.3d 310 (Ramirez v. Dennison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Jankowitz v. New York State Off. of Temporary Disability Assistance
2024 NY Slip Op 31077(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Grochulski v. Dennison
40 A.D.3d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Schwartz v. Dennison
40 A.D.3d 218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Phillips v. Dennison
41 A.D.3d 17 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)