Ramirez v. City of New York

2017 NY Slip Op 4541, 151 A.D.3d 482, 53 N.Y.S.3d 529
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 8, 2017
Docket4189 311198/11
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 4541 (Ramirez v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramirez v. City of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 4541, 151 A.D.3d 482, 53 N.Y.S.3d 529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Faviola Soto, J.), entered December 18, 2015, after a jury trial, in plaintiff’s favor, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the complaint dismissed.

There is no evidence that defendants had prior written notice that the curb in Crotona Park North on which plaintiff tripped was “obstructed” by overgrown vegetation (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201 [c] [1], [2]; Monteleone v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 74 NY2d 917 [1989]; Carlo v Town of Babylon, 55 AD3d 769 [2d Dept 2008]).

Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carlo v. Town of Babylon
55 A.D.3d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 4541, 151 A.D.3d 482, 53 N.Y.S.3d 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2017.