Ramirez v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED

11 P.3d 955, 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 199, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11292, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8463, 2000 Cal. LEXIS 8070
California Supreme Court·Decided October 18, 2000·No. S085000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

101 Cal.Rptr.2d 199 (2000)
11 P.3d 955

Robert RAMIREZ, III, Respondent,
v.
CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED, Appellant.

No. S085000.

Supreme Court of California.

October 18, 2000.

Pursuant to rule 29.4(c), California Rules of Court, the above-entitled review is DISMISSED and cause is remanded to the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Three.

GEORGE, C.J., MOSK, J., KENNARD, J., BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., and BROWN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramirez v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED, 11 P.3d 955, 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 199, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11292, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8463, 2000 Cal. LEXIS 8070 (Cal. 2000).

11 P.3d 955 (Ramirez v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. Wilder
47 S.W.3d 335 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 2001)