Ramirez v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED
11 P.3d 955, 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 199, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11292, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8463, 2000 Cal. LEXIS 8070
This text of 11 P.3d 955 (Ramirez v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ramirez v. CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED, 11 P.3d 955, 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 199, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11292, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8463, 2000 Cal. LEXIS 8070 (Cal. 2000).
Opinion
Robert RAMIREZ, III, Respondent,
v.
CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INCORPORATED, Appellant.
Supreme Court of California.
Pursuant to rule 29.4(c), California Rules of Court, the above-entitled review is DISMISSED and cause is remanded to the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Three.
GEORGE, C.J., MOSK, J., KENNARD, J., BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., and BROWN, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. Wilder
47 S.W.3d 335 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 P.3d 955, 101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 199, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11292, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8463, 2000 Cal. LEXIS 8070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-v-circuit-city-stores-incorporated-cal-2000.