Ramirez, Natividad Jr

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 26, 2019
DocketWR-89,971-01
StatusPublished

This text of Ramirez, Natividad Jr (Ramirez, Natividad Jr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramirez, Natividad Jr, (Tex. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-89,971-01

EX PARTE NATIVIDAD RAMIREZ, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W07-12773-H(A) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant entered an open plea of guilty to

robbery, and originally received ten years of deferred adjudication community supervision. He was

later adjudicated guilty and sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment.

In this application, Applicant alleges that he is being improperly denied credit for time spent

in prison pursuant to another conviction before his guilt was adjudicated in this case. He also alleges

that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered and that he received ineffective

assistance of counsel. 2

After a review of the records, we find that Applicant's claims of involuntary plea and

ineffective assistance of counsel are without merit. Those claims are denied. Applicant’s claims of

denial of pre-adjudication time credit are dismissed. Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2004) (Where an inmate seeks pre-sentence jail time credit, "[t]he appropriate remedy in this

situation is to require Applicant to present the issue to the trial court by way of a nunc pro tunc

motion, . . . [and] [i]f the trial court fails to respond, Applicant is first required to seek relief in the

Court of Appeals, by way of a petition for a writ of mandamus, unless there is a compelling reason

not to do so.").

Filed: June 26, 2019 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Ybarra
149 S.W.3d 147 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ramirez, Natividad Jr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-natividad-jr-texcrimapp-2019.