Ramirez (Miguel) Vs. State
This text of 478 P.3d 400 (Ramirez (Miguel) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ, No. 82182 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE Respondent, JAN 0 8 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY C DEPZ16:24"- ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from "the decision of the Nevada Board of Parole Commissioner's, [sic] for a rehearing of revocation held on October 1, 2020." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E.
Delaney, Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a decision
of the Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners to revoke parole. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Further, it appears frorn the district court minute and docket entries that the district court did not preside over a parole revocation proceeding or render a decision resolving a parole revocation matter. Accordingly this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Cadish
, J. J. Herndon SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I 947A /- 00 5 3 I cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Miguel Angel Ramirez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I 947A 441t4c, 2 - a.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 P.3d 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-miguel-vs-state-nev-2021.