Ramirez (Miguel) Vs. State

478 P.3d 400
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 8, 2021·No. 82182·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ, No. 82182 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE Respondent,

JAN 0 8 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY C

DEPZ16:24"-

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from "the decision of the Nevada Board of Parole Commissioner's, [sic] for a rehearing of revocation held on October 1, 2020." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E.

Delaney, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a decision

of the Nevada Board of Parole Commissioners to revoke parole. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Further, it appears frorn the district court minute and docket entries that the district court did not preside over a parole revocation proceeding or render a decision resolving a parole revocation matter. Accordingly this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Cadish

, J. J.

Herndon

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I 947A /- 00 5 3 I cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Miguel Angel Ramirez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I 947A 441t4c, 2 - a.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramirez (Miguel) Vs. State, 478 P.3d 400 (Neb. 2021).

478 P.3d 400 (Ramirez (Miguel) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)