Ramirez-Lluveras v. Rivera-Merced

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ramirez-Lluveras v. Rivera-Merced. Read the opinion of the Court — 759 F.3d 10
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided August 4, 2014·No. 13-1169·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Nos. 11-2339, 13-1169

EVELYN RAMÍREZ-LLUVERAS; JENITZA CÁCERES, represented by Evelyn Ramírez-Lluveras; M.C., represented by Evelyn Ramírez-Lluveras; M.A.C., represented by Evelyn Ramírez-Lluveras,

Plaintiffs, Appellees/Cross-Appellants,

v.

EDWIN RIVERA-MERCED; PEDRO TOLEDO-DÁVILA; LIEUTENANT VÍCTOR CRUZ-SÁNCHEZ; SERGEANT RAFAEL FIGUEROA- SOLÍS; SERGEANT JUAN COLÓN-BÁEZ,

Defendants, Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

JAVIER PAGÁN-CRUZ; CARLOS SUSTACHE-SUSTACHE; ZULMA DÍAZ; MIGUEL VÁZQUEZ-SAN ANTONIO; JOHN DOES A-Z, Rep. Employees, Contractors, or Agents of the P.R. Police Department,

Defendants.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on July 14, 2014 is amended as follows:

On page 21, line 19, "held" is replaced with "[held]".

On page 44, line 15: "Eight" is replaced with "Eighth".

On page 45, line 17: "Pagán's" is replaced with "Cáceres's".

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramirez-Lluveras v. Rivera-Merced, (1st Cir. 2014).

Ramirez-Lluveras v. Rivera-Merced (Ramirez-Lluveras v. Rivera-Merced) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.