Ramirez-leon v. Holder

376 F. App'x 680
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 16, 2010
Docket07-72765
StatusUnpublished

This text of 376 F. App'x 680 (Ramirez-leon v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramirez-leon v. Holder, 376 F. App'x 680 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Baltazar Ramirez-Leon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for adjustment of status. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA properly denied Ramirez-Leon’s application for relief because he failed to depart within the voluntary departure period after receiving adequate notice of the penalties for failure to do so. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d)(l)(B) (failure to depart voluntarily within the time period results in a ten-year bar to certain forms of relief, including adjustment of status); De Martinez v. Ashcroft, 374 F.3d 759, 762 (9th Cir.2004) (BIA’s written notice of the penalties for failure to depart is adequate under 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d)).

Ramirez-Leon’s remaining contentions are not persuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 F. App'x 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-leon-v-holder-ca9-2010.