Ramirez, Gabriel Eduardo

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 14, 2015
DocketPD-0866-15
StatusPublished

This text of Ramirez, Gabriel Eduardo (Ramirez, Gabriel Eduardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramirez, Gabriel Eduardo, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PD-0865&0866-15

no. F-W5(p5G?& GABRIEL EDUARDO RAMIREZ IN THE TEXAS COURT

VS. OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ,_ rteCtiVED IN THE STATE OF TEXAS AT AUSTINC0URT 0F CRIMINAL APPEALS SEEKING DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM ADECISION ByWe1** 201b COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS IN CAUSE NOS. 05-14-01140-CR& 05-14-01141-CRh^!iSf>^^ fw

PETITIONER'S , GABRIEL EDUARDO RAMIREZ'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FILED IN TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: C°URT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ii ii i<» in^™

COMES NOW, Petitioner, Gabriel Eduardo Ramirez, pro se and

respectfully requests that the time for filing of Petitioner, Gabriel Eduardo Rannfil^zjk:oste> Clerk Petition for Discretionary Review in the above -styled and numbered cause be

extended. In support of this motion the Petitioner would show the Court the following:

I.

In Cause No. F13-56566-V Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault

punishment was assessed at confinement for twenty years in the Texas Department of

CriminaUustice, Institutional Division; in Cause No. F13-59694-V Appellant was

convicted of stalking and punishment was assessed at 10 years. The Court of Appeals

affirmed the appeal on June 23, 2015.

II.

The present deadline for filing of Petitioner /Appellant's Petition for

Discretionary Review is July 23, 2015. Petitioner respectfully requests an extension of

time untiF^pMllP-fl .20115. No previous extension of time has been granted.

IV.

Petitioner would show the Court that a reasonable explanation exists for

the requested extension. The facts on which petitioner relies to reasonably explain the

need for this extension are as follows:

Petitioner has not had sufficient time after receipt of the opinion of the

Court of Criminal Appeals to prepare his petition for discretionary review, pro se, for

filing with this Court.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Petitioner respectfully

requests that the time for filing of the Petition for Discretionary Review be extended to

the aforementioned date.

Gabriel Eduardo Ramirez, Petitioner trt

Street

City, State, Zip

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing motion has been served on the Assistant District Attorney for Dallas County- Appellate Section, Frank Crowley Courts Building, Lock Box 19, Dallas, Texas 75207-4399 by depositing same in the United States Mail, Postage Prepaid, on this the day of , 201 .

Petitioner, Gabriel Eduardo Ramirez

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ramirez, Gabriel Eduardo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-gabriel-eduardo-texapp-2015.