Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski

District Court, S.D. Florida·Decided November 20, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-24838·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 23-24838-CIV-LENARD/ELFENBEIN

RAMINDESIGN, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

JACEK SKARZYNSKI and OLGA SKARZYNSKI,

Defendants. ________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (D.E. 121) AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE (D.E. 88) AS MOOT

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein (“Report,” D.E. 121) recommending the Court deny Plaintiff Ramindesign, LLC’s Motion to Strike Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses (D.E. 88) as moot and without prejudice. The Report provides the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file objections. As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed. Failure to file objections shall bar parties from attacking on appeal the factual findings contained in the Report. See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Therefore, after an independent review of the Report and record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report (D.E. 121) is ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiff Ramindesign, LLC’s Motion to Strike Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses (D.E. 88) is DENIED as moot and without prejudice. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 20th day of November, 2024.

Onn A. LENARD / — UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski, (S.D. Fla. 2024).

Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski (Ramindesign, LLC v. Skarzynski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.
996 F.2d 1144 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)