Ramey v. Woodward
44 So. 769, 90 Miss. 777
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
There is no provision in the law for the courts to entertain contests between rival candidates of a particular political party, and determine for that party which of the candidates shall be declared its nominee. Under the primary election law of this state, this right is wisely committed to the constituted authorities of the party itself, and their determination of it is final and conclusive. The only contests that the courts can entertain are those originating under general election laws.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramey v. Woodward, 44 So. 769, 90 Miss. 777 (Mich. 1907).
44 So. 769 (Ramey v. Woodward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Bell
962 So. 2d 537 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2007)
In Re Wilbourn
590 So. 2d 1381 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1991)
Kellum v. Johnson
115 So. 2d 147 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1959)
Brumfield v. Brock
142 So. 745 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1932)
Barnes v. McLeod
140 So. 740 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1932)
Howard v. Sheldon
117 So. 839 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1928)
State ex rel. Hatfield v. Carrington
194 Iowa 785 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1922)
State ex rel. Boone v. Metts
88 So. 125 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1921)
Whedon v. Brown
118 N.W. 1086 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1908)
State ex rel. Jacob v. Brown
44 So. 769 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1907)