Ramey v. Traxler

Fourth Circuit

Ramey v. Traxler

588 F. App'x 260

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2014·No. No. 14-7208·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Randall Ramey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ramey v. Chief Justice Wm. B. Traxler, No. 1:14-cv-02390-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[261] quately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Randall Ramey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ramey v. Chief Justice Wm. B. Traxler, No. 1:14-cv-02390-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade[261] quately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ramey v. Traxler, 588 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

588 F. App'x 260 (Ramey v. Traxler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related