Ramey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ramey v. State

176 So. 614, 27 Ala. App. 567, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 135

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided October 26, 1937·No. 6 Div. 208.·Published

Opinion

*568 SAMFORD, Judge.

The defendant was-indicted jointly with another, charged with the above offense. The trial was -had before the judge of the circuit court without a jury. On hearing the evidence, this defendant was alone convicted.

We have examined the bill of exceptions and the rulings of the court thereon, and, giving to the findings of the judge the presumptions to which they are entitled, we find no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*568 SAMFORD, Judge.

The defendant was-indicted jointly with another, charged with the above offense. The trial was -had before the judge of the circuit court without a jury. On hearing the evidence, this defendant was alone convicted.

We have examined the bill of exceptions and the rulings of the court thereon, and, giving to the findings of the judge the presumptions to which they are entitled, we find no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ramey v. State, 176 So. 614, 27 Ala. App. 567, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 135 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

176 So. 614 (Ramey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.