Ramey v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ramey v. State

176 So. 614, 27 Ala. App. 567, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 135

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 26, 1937

Docket6 Div. 208.

StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 614 (Ramey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramey v. State, 176 So. 614, 27 Ala. App. 567, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 135 (Ala. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

*568 SAMFORD, Judge.

The defendant was-indicted jointly with another, charged with the above offense. The trial was -had before the judge of the circuit court without a jury. On hearing the evidence, this defendant was alone convicted.

We have examined the bill of exceptions and the rulings of the court thereon, and, giving to the findings of the judge the presumptions to which they are entitled, we find no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*568 SAMFORD, Judge.

The defendant was-indicted jointly with another, charged with the above offense. The trial was -had before the judge of the circuit court without a jury. On hearing the evidence, this defendant was alone convicted.

We have examined the bill of exceptions and the rulings of the court thereon, and, giving to the findings of the judge the presumptions to which they are entitled, we find no error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 So. 614, 27 Ala. App. 567, 1937 Ala. App. LEXIS 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramey-v-state-alactapp-1937.