Ramey, Joshua v. Sleep Zone, Inc.

2021 TN WC 161
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMarch 18, 2021
Docket2020-02-0173
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 TN WC 161 (Ramey, Joshua v. Sleep Zone, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramey, Joshua v. Sleep Zone, Inc., 2021 TN WC 161 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2021).

Opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT GRAY

JOSHUA RAMEY, ) Docket No.:2020-02-0173 Employee, )

V. )

SLEEP ZONE, INC., ) State File No.:334112019 Employer, )

And )

FLAGSHIP CITY INSURANCE CO., ) Judge Brian K. Addington Carrier, )

ABIGAIL HUDGENS, Administrator, )

Subsequent Injury Fund. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING REQUESTED BENEFITS

Mr. Ramey asked the Court to order Sleep Zone to provide additional workers’ compensation benefits for injuries when he fell backward while carrying a mattress. Sleep Zone denied the claim because, after viewing surveillance video, the authorized treating physician determined Mr. Ramey’s current complaints are not causally related to the fall. For the reasons below, the Court holds Mr. Ramey is not entitled to the requested benefits.

History of Claim

Mr. Ramey fell backward while carrying a mattress on May 7, 2019, and alleged injuries to multiple body parts. Dr. Jody Helms, an authorized treating physician, referred him to physical therapy and ordered epidural steroid injections. Mr. Ramey missed several physical therapy appointments and the injections, so those providers discharged him from care.

Sleep Zone became suspicious of Mr. Ramey’s complaints after his non-compliance with medical treatment and began surveillance of his activities beginning in June 2019. Mr. Ramey testified that in December 2020 he experienced an inability to get out of bed or walk any distance, his left shoulder popping out its socket, severe ankle pain, and neck pain from turning his head. However, the surveillance which continued into December 2020, suggested that Mr. Ramey participated in normal everyday activities of driving, shopping, playing sports, and working.

Sleep Zone provided the initial surveillance videos to Dr. Helms. After reviewing the videos and watching Mr. Ramey walk to his car without any hesitation on July 8, 2019, he noted he would not expect Mr. Ramey to perform the activities on the videos based on how he presented in his office. That same day, Dr. Helms released Mr. Ramey from treatment and placed him at maximum medical improvement without restrictions or impairment.

In response to Dr. Helms’s discharge, Mr. Ramey argued that the man in the surveillance video was his twin brother. Mr. Ramey acknowledged he has worked for most of the time since his injury but complained of constant pain and requested additional treatment. Aside from requesting medical treatment, Mr. Ramey also requested temporary disability benefits, although he was unsure of the dates of employment and amounts earned.

Sleep Zone argued that Mr. Ramey has been untruthful about his need for medical treatment as shown by the surveillance and Dr. Helms’s opinion, and it requested that the Court deny his requests.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Ramey must show that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2020) The Court holds he did not.

To recover medical benefits, Mr. Ramey must show, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, that the May 7, 2019 fall contributed more than fifty percent in causing the need for medical treatment. See Burleson v. Germantown Partners Supercuts, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 49, at *9-10 (Aug. 15, 2017).

Here, the Court finds that Mr. Ramey presented no testimony or other proof to contradict Dr. Helms’s opinions. No medical proof established that his employment contributed more than fifty percent in causing the need for medical treatment. The Court also finds that Mr. Ramey was not credible. He grossly misrepresented his condition to Dr. Helms and to the Court. Mr. Ramey’s argument that the video showed his twin brother was unconvincing. Therefore, the Court holds Mr. Ramey is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits and denies his request for medical benefits.

Mr. Ramey also requested temporary disability benefits. There are two kinds of temporary disability benefits: temporary total and temporary partial. To receive temporary

2 total disability benefits, Mr. Ramey must prove (1) he became disabled from working due to a work injury; (2) a causal connection between the injury and his inability to work; and (3) the duration of his disability. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015). Concerning temporary partial disability benefits, Mr. Ramey is eligible for benefits if he earned less than his average weekly wage due to work restrictions. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-207(2)(A).

Here, Mr. Ramey submitted no medical proof taking him off work after July 8, 2019. Instead, Mr. Ramey testified he continued to work for other employers but could not recall the dates of his employment or the amounts he earned. Considering the lack of evidence, the Court finds Mr. Ramey is not likely to succeed at a hearing on the merits regarding additional temporary disability benefits.

It is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Court denies Mr. Ramey’s requested medical and temporary disability benefits.

2. This case is scheduled for a Status Hearing on May 14, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time. You must dial 855-543-5044 to participate. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues without your participation.

ENTERED March 18, 2021.

/S Brian K. Addington BRIAN K. ADDINGTON, JUDGE Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims APPENDIX Exhibits:

Affidavits

Wage Statement

Panel

Medical Record Table of Contents

Final Medical Report

Declarations of Robert Gox and Ryan Bordis Facebook business advertisement

Bicycle photos

Four videos

CO RPANDMRPWNY

Technical Record:

. Petition for Benefit Determination

. Dispute Certification Notice

. Show Cause Order

. Request for Expedited Hearing

. Sleep Zone’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute

. Order Denying Motion to Dismiss

. Motion for Virtual Participation

. Order Permitting Subsequent Injury Fund’s Attendance by Phone or Video 10. Sleep Zone’s Motion to Deem Admitted

11. Order Denying Motion to Deem Admitted

12. Sleep Zone’s Expedited Hearing Witness and Exhibit List 13. Sleep Zone’s Position Statement for Expedited Hearing

OM TIN NB WN CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a correct copy of this Order was sent on March "8", 2021.

Name Certified | Email | Service sent to: Mail Joshua Ramey, x X | 365 May Ave. Employee Kingsport, TN 37665 rameycain @ yahoo.com Jennifer White, X | jennifer @petersonwhite.com Stephen Stovall, setphen.stovall @petersonwhite.com Employer’s Attorneys Lindsay Hall, 4 lindsay.n.hall @tn.gov Subsequent Injury Fund Attorney

f \ i / ff

i |

f 4 — ta /\ A A (LAn— Spy _—§ PRI"

PENNY SHRU SI, COURT CLERK we.courtclerk @4n.gov

Expedited Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Expedited Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. To appeal an expedited hearing order, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within seven business days of the date the expedited hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon all parties.

2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-207
Tennessee § 50-6-207(2)(A)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 TN WC 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramey-joshua-v-sleep-zone-inc-tennworkcompcl-2021.