Rametta v. Stella

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Rametta v. Stella

565 A.2d 536, 212 Conn. 815, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 290

DecidedSeptember 27, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 565 A.2d 536 (Rametta v. Stella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rametta v. Stella, 565 A.2d 536, 212 Conn. 815, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 290 (Colo. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. 223, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. In a tort action,, does the collateral source rule apply to proceeds received by the plaintiff which are not payments in compensation for the plaintiff’s injury or loss?

“2. In a contract action, must the calculation of the plaintiff’s damages consider the effect of a third party agreement, subsequent to the breach, which would diminish the plaintiffs actual loss?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. 223, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. In a tort action,, does the collateral source rule apply to proceeds received by the plaintiff which are not payments in compensation for the plaintiff’s injury or loss?

“2. In a contract action, must the calculation of the plaintiff’s damages consider the effect of a third party agreement, subsequent to the breach, which would diminish the plaintiffs actual loss?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

565 A.2d 536, 212 Conn. 815, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rametta-v-stella-conn-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack