Ramer v. Commissioner

394 F. App'x 353
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 30, 2010
Docket10-1584
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 394 F. App'x 353 (Ramer v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramer v. Commissioner, 394 F. App'x 353 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lester Ramer appeals the tax court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this tax-deficiency action. Ramer has also filed a motion challenging the tax court’s return of certain documents for noncompliance -with the court’s rules, and a motion to “strike” certain federal rules and statutes.

Upon careful de novo review of the tax court’s summary judgment decision, see Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v. Comm’r, 594 F.3d 968, 970 (8th Cir.2010) (standard for reviewing tax court’s summary judgment decision), petition for cert. filed, 78 U.S.L.W. 3653 (U.S. Apr. 30, 2010) (No. 09-1339), we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the tax court, and we find no merit to any of Ramer’s arguments on appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm the tax court’s decision. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motions.

1

. The Honorable L. Paige Marvel, United States Tax Court Judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramer v. Commissioner
178 L. Ed. 2d 830 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 F. App'x 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramer-v-commissioner-ca8-2010.