Ramento v. M & M Tanks, Inc
This text of Ramento v. M & M Tanks, Inc (Ramento v. M & M Tanks, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000668 07-JAN-2015 09:08 AM
SCWC-11-0000668
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
MARCELINO RAMENTO, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
M&M TANKS, INC., Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant,
and
JOHN S. BRUNS, Plaintiff.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-11-0000668; CIV. NO. 07-1-1920)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court
of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was
filed, see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see
also Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1)
(2012),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Defendant-
Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed December 24, 2014, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing
the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014) (“The
application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of
the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or
dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is
extended in accordance with this rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 7, 2015.
Carl H. Osaki /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael W. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ramento v. M & M Tanks, Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramento-v-m-m-tanks-inc-haw-2015.