Ramdamar v. State

848 So. 2d 454, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9933, 2003 WL 21505972
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 2, 2003·No. No. 4D02-2755·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking the appellant’s probation but remand for the trial court to enter a written order in accordance with its oral pronouncement. See Taramona v. State, 707 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

GUNTHER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ramdamar v. State, 848 So. 2d 454, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9933, 2003 WL 21505972 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

848 So. 2d 454 (Ramdamar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeLillo v. DeLillo
848 So. 2d 454 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)