Rambo v. State

805 So. 2d 829, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9764, 2001 WL 804077
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 2001·No. No. 2D01-1051·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Gary R. Rambo appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to any right Rambo might have to file a motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to rule 3.850 and Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc), or any right Rambo might have to file a petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the Department of Correction’s denial of gain time in the circuit court in the county where he is incarcerated pursuant to Newsome v. Singletary, 637 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rambo v. State, 805 So. 2d 829, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9764, 2001 WL 804077 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

805 So. 2d 829 (Rambo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rambo v. State
816 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Flyer Printing Company, Inc. v. Hill
805 So. 2d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)