Ramberg v. Tibbitts

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ramberg v. Tibbitts

262 So. 2d 736, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6809

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 1972

DocketNo. 71-1370

StatusPublished

This text of 262 So. 2d 736 (Ramberg v. Tibbitts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramberg v. Tibbitts, 262 So. 2d 736, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial judge granting a new trial because of errors in the charge given the jury. We agree that the errors may have been substantial in their impact upon the jury and affirm the order appealed. See Railway [737]*737Express Agency, Inc. v. Fulmer, Fla.1969, 227 So.2d 870; Bernstein v. Coats, Fla.App.1971, 247 So.2d 725; Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Flournoy, Fla.App.1961, 136 So.2d 32.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial judge granting a new trial because of errors in the charge given the jury. We agree that the errors may have been substantial in their impact upon the jury and affirm the order appealed. See Railway [737]*737Express Agency, Inc. v. Fulmer, Fla.1969, 227 So.2d 870; Bernstein v. Coats, Fla.App.1971, 247 So.2d 725; Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Flournoy, Fla.App.1961, 136 So.2d 32.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 So. 2d 736, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramberg-v-tibbitts-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack