Ramberg v. Tibbitts
262 So. 2d 736, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6809
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the trial judge granting a new trial because of errors in the charge given the jury. We agree that the errors may have been substantial in their impact upon the jury and affirm the order appealed. See Railway [737]*737Express Agency, Inc. v. Fulmer, Fla.1969, 227 So.2d 870; Bernstein v. Coats, Fla.App.1971, 247 So.2d 725; Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Flournoy, Fla.App.1961, 136 So.2d 32.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramberg v. Tibbitts, 262 So. 2d 736, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6809 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
262 So. 2d 736 (Ramberg v. Tibbitts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Fulmer
227 So. 2d 870 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Flournoy
136 So. 2d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
Bernstein v. Coats
247 So. 2d 725 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)