Ramapo v. Village of Spring Valley
This text of 193 N.E.2d 892 (Ramapo v. Village of Spring Valley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appeal dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that it presents questions other than the constitutionality of a statute (N. Y. Const., art. VI, § 3, subd. b, par. [2]; Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 4, now CPLR, § 5601, subd. [b], par. 2).
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis dissents in the following opinion in which Judge Foster concurs:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 N.E.2d 892, 13 N.Y.2d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramapo-v-village-of-spring-valley-ny-1963.