Ramapo Manufacturing Co. v. Mapes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ramapo Manufacturing Co. v. Mapes

151 A.D. 888, 135 N.Y.S. 1138

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ramapo Manufacturing Co. v. Mapes. Read the opinion of the Court — 155 A.D. 443 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1912·Published

Opinion

There is no clear evidence that the order denying defendant’s application to postpone the trial has been entered, nor that any motion to open the default has been made, nor that any notice of appeal has been served. Under such circumstances this court will not entertain this application. Motion denied, without costs, without prejudice to a renewal of the application upon further papers. Present — Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

There is no clear evidence that the order denying defendant’s application to postpone the trial has been entered, nor that any motion to open the default has been made, nor that any notice of appeal has been served. Under such circumstances this court will not entertain this application. Motion denied, without costs, without prejudice to a renewal of the application upon further papers. Present — Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.

Ramapo Manufacturing Co. v. Mapes, 151 A.D. 888, 135 N.Y.S. 1138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

151 A.D. 888 (Ramapo Manufacturing Co. v. Mapes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.