Ramallah Trading Co. v. United States

35 Cust. Ct. 349
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 16, 1955
DocketNo. 59573; protests 223892-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 349 (Ramallah Trading Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ramallah Trading Co. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 349 (cusc 1955).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

It .was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked “A” consist of jacquard-figured bedspreads, composed in chief value of cotton, having a staple less than 1)4 inches in length, and that the items marked “B” consist of jacquard-figured upholstery cloths (not pile fabrics), which are table scarves, composed in chief value of cotton, having a staple of less than 1% inches in length. Accepting the stipulation as a statement of fact, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 911 (a), as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476), for jacquard-figured bedspreads, wholly or in chief value of cotton, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 27)4 parcent under the provision in paragraph 908, as modified, supra, for jacquard-figured scarves, wholly or in chief value of cotton.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Cust. Ct. 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramallah-trading-co-v-united-states-cusc-1955.