RAM I LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

44 N.E.3d 221, 26 N.Y.3d 1068, 23 N.Y.S.3d 146
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2015·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The appeal should be dismissed, without costs, as moot.

The tenant having vacated the rent-controlled apartment at issue, pursuant to a stipulation of settlement with petitioner, this appeal has been rendered moot (see Matter of Grand Jury Subpoenas for Locals 17, 135, 257 & 608 of United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., AFL-CIO, 72 NY2d 307, 311 [1988]; Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707 [1980]). The exception to the mootness doctrine is not applicable here (see Wisholek v Douglas, 97 NY2d 740, 742 [2002]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Pigott, Rivera, AbdusSalaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, as moot, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RAM I LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal, 44 N.E.3d 221, 26 N.Y.3d 1068, 23 N.Y.S.3d 146 (N.Y. 2015).

44 N.E.3d 221 (RAM I LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Tribeca Equity Partners, L.P. v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal
2016 NY Slip Op 7849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)