Ralston v. Yim
This text of Ralston v. Yim (Ralston v. Yim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30082 30-OCT-2012 08:41 AM
NO. SCWC-30082
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
RICK RALSTON, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. ERROL Y. W. YIM, D.D.S., Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30082; CIV. NO. 08-1-0934)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ahn, in place of Pollack, J., recused)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Errol Y. W. Yim, D.D.S.’s
application for writ of certiorari filed on September 21, 2012,
is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 30, 2012.
John Reyes-Burke for /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Sue V. Hansen for respondent /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Karen S. S. Ahn
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ralston v. Yim, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralston-v-yim-haw-2012.