Ralston v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.
This text of 625 So. 2d 156 (Ralston v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James G. RALSTON, M.D. and Evelyn Darise Ralston
v.
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
PER CURIAM.
Granted. There are genuine issues of material fact in this case such as whether plaintiff is in fact infertile, the cause of the infertility, *157 whether such infertility is a sickness under the policy, whether in vitro fertilization is a treatment, and whether the treatment was necessary or essential. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, as affirmed by the court of appeal, is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
KIMBALL, J., not on panel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
625 So. 2d 156, 1993 La. LEXIS 2746, 1993 WL 391053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralston-v-connecticut-general-life-ins-co-la-1993.