Ralston Purina v. Tancak

508 So. 2d 549, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1483, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8947
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 1987·No. No. BN-183·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Employer/carrier appeal a workers’ compensation order by which it was determined that claimant sustained a compensable injury. It was further found that employer/carrier is responsible for payment of medical bills, and jurisdiction was reserved by agreement of the parties on the pending claim for temporary disability and wage loss benefits. In accordance with the parties’ agreement to reserve jurisdiction the order thus did not. dispose of all matured issues in controversy and is therefore interlocutory and not immediately reviewable by appeal. See Metropolitan Life v. Antonucci, 469 So.2d 952 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Town of Palm Beach v. Watts, 426 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to seek review by subsequent appeal from a final order.

MILLS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ralston Purina v. Tancak, 508 So. 2d 549, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1483, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8947 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

508 So. 2d 549 (Ralston Purina v. Tancak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

HINES ELEC. v. McClure
616 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
McGurn v. Scott
596 So. 2d 1042 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)