Ralston Purina Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Ralston Purina Co. v. United States

68 Cust. Ct. 352, 1972 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2569

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 11, 1972

DocketC.R.D. 72-2

StatusPublished

This text of 68 Cust. Ct. 352 (Ralston Purina Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ralston Purina Co. v. United States, 68 Cust. Ct. 352, 1972 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2569 (cusc 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Eichakdson, Judge:

Plaintiffs move for an order granting a rehearing herein, setting aside the dismissal order entered in this action by the clerk on December 1, 1971, and permitting the action to repose in a suspension disposition file until June 30, 1972; and the motion is opposed by the defendant.

Examination of the entry papers accompanying the motion papers discloses that the merchandise of this action was appraised on [353]*353October 24, 1969, and that the covering entry was liquidated on the same day. Since liquidation of the entry herein occurred within 60 days of the date of the appraiser’s report, liquidation was not made upon a final appraised value as required under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1503(a) (section 503(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1953), and as such, is void. See United States v. Boston Paper Board Co., 23 CCPA 372, T.D. 48233 (1936), and other cases cited in Memorandum to Accompany Order in Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. United States, protest No. 69/38803, C.D. 4301, decided December 1, 1971.

Inasmuch as the liquidation of the subject entry was void, the instant action based thereon was a nullity from its inception. And it follows that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain this motion to revive said action. Consequently, plaintiffs’ motion must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eichakdson, Judge:

Plaintiffs move for an order granting a rehearing herein, setting aside the dismissal order entered in this action by the clerk on December 1, 1971, and permitting the action to repose in a suspension disposition file until June 30, 1972; and the motion is opposed by the defendant.

Examination of the entry papers accompanying the motion papers discloses that the merchandise of this action was appraised on [353]*353October 24, 1969, and that the covering entry was liquidated on the same day. Since liquidation of the entry herein occurred within 60 days of the date of the appraiser’s report, liquidation was not made upon a final appraised value as required under 19 U.S.C.A., section 1503(a) (section 503(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1953), and as such, is void. See United States v. Boston Paper Board Co., 23 CCPA 372, T.D. 48233 (1936), and other cases cited in Memorandum to Accompany Order in Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. United States, protest No. 69/38803, C.D. 4301, decided December 1, 1971.

Inasmuch as the liquidation of the subject entry was void, the instant action based thereon was a nullity from its inception. And it follows that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain this motion to revive said action. Consequently, plaintiffs’ motion must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 Cust. Ct. 352, 1972 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralston-purina-co-v-united-states-cusc-1972.