Ralph v. Howarth

Supreme Court

Ralph v. Howarth

254 U.S. 617, 65 L. Ed. 441

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 17, 1921

DocketNo. 132

StatusPublished

This text of 254 U.S. 617 (Ralph v. Howarth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ralph v. Howarth, 254 U.S. 617, 65 L. Ed. 441 (1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska. Argued January 13, 1921. Decided January 17, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6,1916, c. 448, [618]*618§ 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1. Mr. Byron G. Burbank for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Otto H. Zacek for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska. Argued January 13, 1921. Decided January 17, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6,1916, c. 448, [618]*618§ 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1. Mr. Byron G. Burbank for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Otto H. Zacek for defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 U.S. 617, 65 L. Ed. 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-v-howarth-scotus-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack