Ralph v. Borough of Atlantic Highlands

47 A. 1132, 64 N.J.L. 721, 35 Vroom 721, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 159
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 18, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 47 A. 1132 (Ralph v. Borough of Atlantic Highlands) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ralph v. Borough of Atlantic Highlands, 47 A. 1132, 64 N.J.L. 721, 35 Vroom 721, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 159 (N.J. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error must be affirmed upon the grounds stated in the per curiam memorandum filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—Magie (Chancellor), Lepue (Chief Justice), Van Syckel, Garrison, Lippincott, Gum-mere, Ludlow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees. 12.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A. 1132, 64 N.J.L. 721, 35 Vroom 721, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-v-borough-of-atlantic-highlands-nj-1900.