Ralph Samuel Herring v. Herbert Jones J.R. Yeager

Fourth Circuit

Ralph Samuel Herring v. Herbert Jones J.R. Yeager

21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15890, 1994 WL 83811

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 14, 1994

Docket93-7315

StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 422 (Ralph Samuel Herring v. Herbert Jones J.R. Yeager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ralph Samuel Herring v. Herbert Jones J.R. Yeager, 21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15890, 1994 WL 83811 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ralph Samuel HERRING, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Herbert JONES; J.R. Yeager, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7315.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-191)

Ralph Samuel Herring, appellant pro se.

George H. Gilliam, Kimberley Ann Whittle, Paxson, Smith, Gilliam & Scott, P.C., Charlottesville, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Herring v. Jones, No. CA-93-191 (W.D. Va. Nov. 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ralph Samuel HERRING, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Herbert JONES; J.R. Yeager, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7315.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-191)

Ralph Samuel Herring, appellant pro se.

George H. Gilliam, Kimberley Ann Whittle, Paxson, Smith, Gilliam & Scott, P.C., Charlottesville, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Herring v. Jones, No. CA-93-191 (W.D. Va. Nov. 17, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15890, 1994 WL 83811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-samuel-herring-v-herbert-jones-jr-yeager-ca4-1994.