Ralph Michael Lepiscopo v. United States
This text of 376 F.2d 846 (Ralph Michael Lepiscopo v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*847 OPINION OF THE COURT
Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.
Appellant was convicted in the New Jersey District of bank robbery and use of a dangerous weapon. This Court affirmed the conviction, 343 F.2d 474 (1965) and certiorari was denied, 382 U.S. 864, 86 S.Ct. 129, 15 L.Ed.2d 102 (1965). Appellant was represented by competent counsel throughout his trial and appeal. As to this collateral 28 U.S. C. § 2255 proceeding we must agree with the District Court that the petition and its supplement fail to set forth any sufficient ground for the relief sought.
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
376 F.2d 846, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-michael-lepiscopo-v-united-states-ca3-1967.