Ralph Michael Lepiscopo v. United States

Third Circuit

Ralph Michael Lepiscopo v. United States

376 F.2d 846, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6730

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided April 14, 1967·No. 16246·Published

Opinion

*847 OPINION OF THE COURT

Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the New Jersey District of bank robbery and use of a dangerous weapon. This Court affirmed the conviction, 343 F.2d 474 (1965) and certiorari was denied, 382 U.S. 864, 86 S.Ct. 129, 15 L.Ed.2d 102 (1965). Appellant was represented by competent counsel throughout his trial and appeal. As to this collateral 28 U.S. C. § 2255 proceeding we must agree with the District Court that the petition and its supplement fail to set forth any sufficient ground for the relief sought.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*847 OPINION OF THE COURT

Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted in the New Jersey District of bank robbery and use of a dangerous weapon. This Court affirmed the conviction, 343 F.2d 474 (1965) and certiorari was denied, 382 U.S. 864, 86 S.Ct. 129, 15 L.Ed.2d 102 (1965). Appellant was represented by competent counsel throughout his trial and appeal. As to this collateral 28 U.S. C. § 2255 proceeding we must agree with the District Court that the petition and its supplement fail to set forth any sufficient ground for the relief sought.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Ralph Michael Lepiscopo v. United States, 376 F.2d 846, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6730 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

376 F.2d 846 (Ralph Michael Lepiscopo v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related